Could this be the reason for the poor AI performance? Until now, most of my groups have German names. Since most of my files are in English, it would perhaps be better to choose English names for my groups too rather than having them in German. I have also been thinking whether my group names are the culprit. So it doesn’t seem the glitch can be attributed to indexing. In the above mentioned case, the old Greek groups that were suggested are indexed groups located as folders on an external disk, but the USA groups were all created in DT and are stored on my internal disk. If “Based on content” is enabled, I rarely ever get meaningful suggestions. I’m wondering whether this has any influence on the accuracy of the AI. Thus I can be sure that it was me who performed the tagging … and not the original author of a file. Most of the files I have in DT are in English, and I basically assign tags to all my files in German. It’s not until I switch to “Based on tags” that I get useful suggestions. DT suggests I move the second file into one of the following groups: ![]() For this purpose I imported two files into DT one is a searchable PDF containing information regarding alcohol consumption per capita (15+) (in liters of pure alcohol), and the other one is a Safari webarchive containing general information from the WHO about total population number in the Philippines, life expectancy, total expenditure on health per capita, etc.īased on content, DT suggests I move the first file into one of the following groups (which I created a long time ago):įor some reason, unknown to me, it just seems DT is absolutely obsessed with Old Greek literature. Not long ago, I was working on a newspaper article about alcohol consumption in the Philippines. What is it you have tried and are frustrated with? I rely on DT and when I’ve had any issue the community and DT help has been stellar at setting me back on course, for which I’m very grateful! - MM I use it for other drafting, but not academic writing. I have Scrivener but have not found it convenient to use with Word. I’ll need to hit the tutorials to get comfy with that. I haven’t scripted yet with DT but that may be coming in my future. But to adjust to comments coming in from peer reviewers and committee members I’m think I’m stuck with it. My faculty has a Word template that seems to constrain me to using it. ![]() ![]() I haven’t done much final writing in DY I usually copy out to Word. I use DT as a drafting space all the time, and I collate excerpts into new docs, organized as I wish (and usually saved to a specific workspace) Other gems: what has been super-helpful that not many seem to reference is to organize my work into DT ‘workspaces’ - tabbed collections that enable me to toggle back and forth with open files you have to remember to update the space if you change it up (Workspaces are found at the bottom of the ‘Go’ menu) I also think the OCR has been really helpful. I replicate-duplicate and tag as I wish for convenience My research and writing workflow has evolved with new tools and tricks but I’ve been pretty efficient with the following:ĭT is my main working repository I have largely by-passed Finder and stashed-indexed all my research files in my organized folder system. ![]() I’ve been a satisfied DT client for many years and recommended it to every mac-head I’ve yakked with over many years. I’m just wrapping my dissertation as well, at SFU (Canada) in Education.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |